Bioengineering (Feb 2024)

Standardization of a CT Protocol for Imaging Patients with Suspected COVID-19—A RACOON Project

  • Andrea Steuwe,
  • Benedikt Kamp,
  • Saif Afat,
  • Alena Akinina,
  • Schekeb Aludin,
  • Elif Gülsah Bas,
  • Josephine Berger,
  • Evelyn Bohrer,
  • Alexander Brose,
  • Susanne Martina Büttner,
  • Constantin Ehrengut,
  • Mirjam Gerwing,
  • Sergio Grosu,
  • Alexander Gussew,
  • Felix Güttler,
  • Andreas Heinrich,
  • Petra Jiraskova,
  • Christopher Kloth,
  • Jonathan Kottlors,
  • Marc-David Kuennemann,
  • Christian Liska,
  • Nora Lubina,
  • Mathias Manzke,
  • Felix G. Meinel,
  • Hans-Jonas Meyer,
  • Andreas Mittermeier,
  • Thorsten Persigehl,
  • Lars-Patrick Schmill,
  • Manuel Steinhardt,
  • The RACOON Study Group,
  • Gerald Antoch,
  • Birte Valentin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11030207
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 3
p. 207

Abstract

Read online

CT protocols that diagnose COVID-19 vary in regard to the associated radiation exposure and the desired image quality (IQ). This study aims to evaluate CT protocols of hospitals participating in the RACOON (Radiological Cooperative Network) project, consolidating CT protocols to provide recommendations and strategies for future pandemics. In this retrospective study, CT acquisitions of COVID-19 patients scanned between March 2020 and October 2020 (RACOON phase 1) were included, and all non-contrast protocols were evaluated. For this purpose, CT protocol parameters, IQ ratings, radiation exposure (CTDIvol), and central patient diameters were sampled. Eventually, the data from 14 sites and 534 CT acquisitions were analyzed. IQ was rated good for 81% of the evaluated examinations. Motion, beam-hardening artefacts, or image noise were reasons for a suboptimal IQ. The tube potential ranged between 80 and 140 kVp, with the majority between 100 and 120 kVp. CTDIvol was 3.7 ± 3.4 mGy. Most healthcare facilities included did not have a specific non-contrast CT protocol. Furthermore, CT protocols for chest imaging varied in their settings and radiation exposure. In future, it will be necessary to make recommendations regarding the required IQ and protocol parameters for the majority of CT scanners to enable comparable IQ as well as radiation exposure for different sites but identical diagnostic questions.

Keywords