Translational Medicine Communications (Apr 2020)

Translating pharmacogenetics from research to routine clinical practice – a survey of the IGNITE Network

  • Kenneth D. Levy,
  • R. Ryanne Wu,
  • Daisuke Goto,
  • Michelle A. Ramos,
  • Victoria M. Pratt,
  • J. Kevin Hicks,
  • Ebony B. Madden,
  • Gillian C. Bell,
  • Kathryn V. Blake,
  • Michelle Cohen,
  • Benjamin Q. Duong,
  • James P. Franciosi,
  • Lori A. Orlando,
  • Kunal Sanghavi,
  • Geoffrey S. Ginsburg

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41231-020-00057-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Translating pharmacogenetic research findings that have shown clinical efficacy into sustainable, routine clinical care at the institutional level requires strong evidence of improved patient outcomes bolstered by equitable reimbursement and a sound financial analysis. Although extensive research on the clinical value of pharmacogenetics has been completed, adoption into clinical practice lags due to a lack of evidence of clinical effectiveness and limited reimbursement. Methods The Sustainability Working Group within the NHGRI IGNITE I Network conducted an online survey of funded and non-funded IGNITE members to determine which genes they are researching, which have been translated into clinical practice, and how tests are billed. Data from the online surveys was consolidated and analyzed with results being tabulated for key findings. Due to the limited sample size, statistical analysis was forgone and results should be considered directional in nature. Results Fifteen out of twenty (75%) online survey responses were received and analyzed from IGNITE member sites delivering clinical care. Forty different genes were identified as being used for either research or clinical care. Thirty-two different genes were reported as being used clinically, an average of 6.9 genes were reported per site. Twenty-two and twenty-one genes were reported as being billed to third party payers or patients respectively. Although the survey did not ask whether sites submitting for reimbursement received payment, Medicare and Medicaid only reimburse for 6 of the 40 (15%) genes being tested. Of the 40 genes, 18 are rated by CPIC as having A/B level of evidence with the remainder being rated as C/D or having no rating. Approximately 32% more A/B rated genes were being reported clinically than non-A/B. Conclusion Adoption of pharmacogenetic testing continues to lag even at sites where leading experts conduct research and have the capability to report tests clinically. Clinical research that supports CPIC A level of evidence is important for provider and payer support. Adoption of pharmacogentic testing must also be justified financially, reimbursement is one key factor, and more health economic studies are needed in order to capture the value created by preventing drug-gene adverse events, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.

Keywords