In Autumn 2020, DOAJ will be relaunching with a new website with updated functionality, improved search, and a simplified application form. More information is available on our blog. Our API is also changing.

Hide this message

Metadiscourse Markers in Scientific Journal Articles

Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English. 2020;6(1):1-16 DOI 10.31332/lkw.v6i1.1528

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English

ISSN: 2460-2280 (Print); 2549-9017 (Online)

Publisher: UPT Pengembangan Bahasa IAIN Kendari

LCC Subject Category: Language and Literature: English language | Language and Literature: Oriental languages and literatures

Country of publisher: Indonesia

Language of fulltext: English, Arabic

Full-text formats available: PDF

 

AUTHORS


Veronica Esti Nugrahani (Sanata Dharma University)

Barli Bram (Sanata Dharma University)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 18 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

This paper aimed to investigate the use of metadiscourse markers in scientific journal articles. Data of this qualitative research consisted of metadiscourse markers collected from eight journal articles of a special edition published by LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching.  The collected metadiscourse markers used in the journal articles were analyzed using discourse analysis based on ten metadiscourse marker categories. Results showed that the analysed journal articles contained 708 metadiscourse markers, with more interactive metadiscourse markers, reaching 529 occurrences, than interactional metadiscourse markers, occurring 179 times. Transitions, such as “but” and “thus”, with 249 occurrences, were the most frequently-used metadiscourse marker and boosters, such as “in fact” and “definitely”, with 24 occurrences, were the least productive marker.  Thus, readers can gain a better understanding of the use of metadiscourse markers when using English. It is expected that English language learners and instructors can benefit from the results of this study, particularly concerning the use of metadiscourse markers in academic writing.