Scientific Reports (Aug 2024)

Enhancing performance and sustainability of GGBFS-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete blended with coal bottom ash and metakaolin by using RSM modelling

  • Naraindas Bheel,
  • Mamdooh Alwetaishi,
  • Idris Ahmed Jae,
  • Agusril Syamsir,
  • Ahmed Saleh Alraeeini,
  • Sahl Abdullah Waheeb,
  • Loai Alkhattabi,
  • Omrane Benjeddou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70800-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 28

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This research study is performed on the self-compacting geopolymer concrete (SCGC) combining coal bottom ash (CBA) and metakaolin (MK) as a substitution for GGBFS alone and combined for analysing the fresh properties (slump flow, V-Funnel, and T50 flow), mechanical characteristics (compressive, splitting tensile and flexural strengths) and durability tests (permeability and sulfate attack test). Though, total 195 SCGC samples were made and tested for 28 days. It has been revealed that the consumption of CBA and MK as a substitution for GGBFS alone and combine in the production of SCGC is decreased the workability of SCGC while mechanical characteristics of SCGC are enhanced by utilizing CBA and MK as a substitution for GGBFS alone and combine up to 10%. In addition, the compressive, splitting tensile and flexural strengths were calculated by 59.40 MPa, 5.68 MPa, and 6.12 MPa while using the 5CBA5MK as a substitution for GGBFS in the production of SCGC after 28 days correspondingly. Furthermore, the permeability is decreased by growing the quantity of CBA and MK by the weight of GGBFS alone and jointly in the production of SCGC after 28 days. Besides, the minimum change in length of the SCGC specimen is recorded by 0.062 mm at 7.5MK7.5CBA while the maximum change in length is calculated by 0.11 mm at 10CBA10MK as a substitution for GGBFS at 180 days correspondingly. In addition, the embodied carbon is recorded reduce as the addition of CBA while it is getting higher when the accumulation of MK alone or combined with CBA in SCGC. Besides, response models for prediction were constructed and confirmed using ANOVA at an accuracy rate of 95%. The models' R2 fluctuated from 88 to 99%. It has been observed that the utilization of CBA and MK alone and together up to 10% as substitution for GGBFS in geopolymer concrete provides the best results therefore it is suggested for structural applications.

Keywords