Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (Jul 2020)

Indirect comparison of efficacy between different antibiotic prophylaxis against the intracranial infection after craniotomy

  • Yulong Cao,
  • Bin Wang,
  • Jiao Shan,
  • Zhizhong Gong,
  • Jiqiu Kuang,
  • Yan Gao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00784-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Many studies had shown that prophylactic use of antibiotics could significantly reduce the intracranial infection (ICI) rate of craniotomy. However, there has been no comparison of these antibiotics. Methods An electronic database search was performed, from inception to June 102,020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) using different intravenous antibiotics (IVA) against the ICIs after craniotomy were considered. The primary outcome was the incidence rates of ICIs. An indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was conducted to compare the protective effect among the diverse antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent ICIs after craniotomy. Risk of potential bias was assessed. Results A total of 3214 patients after craniotomy in 11 studies were included, 159 patients experienced postoperative ICI, including 33 patients in the antibacterial group and 126 in the control group. The calculate results of meta-analysis showed that except fusidic acid, preoperative intravenous injection of cephalosporin, clindamycin, vancomycin, and penicillin can significantly reduce the incidence of ICI after craniotomy, and ITC showed there was no statistically significance difference in the rates of post craniotomy ICI between the various antibiotics. Conclusion The current evidence shows that low-grade antibacterial drugs can be selected to prevent ICI after craniotomy, but this may be due to the limited number of studies per antibiotic. It still needs more high-quality, large sample RCT to confirm. Systemic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019133369.

Keywords