Journal of Personalized Medicine (Aug 2022)

Current Use of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Results from an Italian Multicenter Prospective Study—The ISNEP Study

  • Francesco De Stefano,
  • Alberto Benassi,
  • Alberto Maria Cappelletti,
  • Francesco Donatelli,
  • Damiano Regazzoli,
  • Salvatore Tolaro,
  • Francesca Perego,
  • Angelo Silverio,
  • Alessandra Scatteia,
  • Pasquale Guarini,
  • Santo Dellegrottaglie,
  • Simona Mariani,
  • Elpidio Pezzella,
  • Gennaro Galasso,
  • Francesco Caiazza,
  • on behalf of ISNEP Investigators

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091419
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 9
p. 1419

Abstract

Read online

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart arrhythmia, and its prevalence increases with age. Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (OAT) with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is essential to avoid thromboembolic events in AF. However, this treatment is associated with a high risk of bleeding and low adherence in elderly patients. Aim: The aim was to evaluate the real-world use of OAT in a population of patients aged ≥80 years in twenty-three Italian centers and to investigate the tolerance of and patient satisfaction with this therapy. Methods: The ISNEP Study is a multicenter cross-sectional study enrolling patients with AF and aged ≥80 years and treated with either NOACs or VKAs. A written questionnaire was administered to each patient to evaluate the adherence to and patient satisfaction with this therapy. Results: The study included 641 patients with a mean age of 85 (82–87) years. The use of NOACs was reported in 93.0% of cases, with the remaining 7.0% treated with VKAs. A history of stroke events was reported in five (11.1%) and one (0.2%) patients in the VKA and NOAC groups, respectively. The rate of referred ecchymosis/epistaxis was significantly higher in the VKA group compared to the NOAC group (p < 0.001). Patients receiving NOACs reported a substantial improvement in their quality of life compared to the VKA group. Conclusions: A small, but not negligible, proportion of elderly AF patients is still treated with VKAs. Patients treated with NOAC have a higher level of satisfaction with the therapy and complete adherence.

Keywords