Journal of Translational Medicine (Aug 2012)

Prevalence of <it>KRAS</it>, <it>BRAF</it>, and <it>PIK3CA</it> somatic mutations in patients with colorectal carcinoma may vary in the same population: clues from Sardinia

  • Palomba Grazia,
  • Colombino Maria,
  • Contu Antonio,
  • Massidda Bruno,
  • Baldino Giovanni,
  • Pazzola Antonio,
  • Ionta MariaTeresa,
  • Capelli Francesca,
  • Trova Vittorio,
  • Sedda Tito,
  • Sanna Giovanni,
  • Tanda Francesco,
  • Budroni Mario,
  • Palmieri Giuseppe,
  • Cossu Antonio

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-178
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
p. 178

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Role of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been recently investigated worldwide. In this population-based study, we evaluated the incidence rates and distribution of such somatic mutations in genetically isolated population from Sardinia. Methods From April 2009 to July 2011, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (N = 478) were prospectively collected from Sardinian CRC patients at clinics across the entire island. Genomic DNA was isolated from tissue sections and screened for mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes by automated DNA sequencing. Results Overall, KRAS tumour mutation rate was 30% (145/478 positive cases). Distribution of mutation carriers was surprisingly different within the island: 87/204 (43%) in North Sardinia vs. 58/274 (21%) in Middle-South Sardinia (pBRAF gene; PIK3CA was found mutated in 67 (17%) patients. A significant inverse distribution of PIK3CA mutation rates was observed within Sardinian population: 19/183 (10%) cases from northern vs. 48/201 (24%) cases from central-southern island (pKRAS/PIK3CA somatic mutations is consistent with already-reported discrepancies in distribution of germline mutations for other malignancies within Sardinian population. Preliminary clinical evaluation of 118 KRAS wild-type patients undergoing anti-EGFR-based treatment indicated lack of role for PIK3CA in predicting response to therapy. Conclusions Our findings support the hypothesis that differences in patients’ origins and related genetic backgrounds may contribute to even determine the incidence rate of somatic mutations in candidate cancer genes.

Keywords