To decentralize or to continue on the centralization track: The cases of authoritarian regimes in Russia and Kazakhstan

Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018;9(1):61-71 DOI 10.1016/j.euras.2017.12.008


Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Journal of Eurasian Studies

ISSN: 1879-3665 (Print); 1879-3673 (Online)

Publisher: SAGE Publishing

Society/Institution: Asia-Pacific Research Center

LCC Subject Category: Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Geography (General) | Political science

Country of publisher: United Kingdom

Language of fulltext: English

Full-text formats available: PDF, HTML, ePUB



Irina Busygina (Department of Political Science, National Research University “Higher School of Economics” in Saint Petersburg, Naberezhnaya kanala Griboedova 123, St. Petersburg, Russia)
Mikhail Filippov (Department of Political Science, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA)
Elmira Taukebaeva (South-Kazakhstan University, Department of International Relations and Political Science, prospect Tauke Khana 5, Shymkent, Kazakhstan)


Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 8 weeks


Abstract | Full Text

Decisions on decentralization versus centralization come as a result of strategic choices made by politicians after weighing their costs and benefits. In authoritarian regimes, the highest-priority political task is that of restraining political competition and securing power in the hands of the incumbent. This task incentivizes politicians to restrict political decentralization (or at least block reforms promoting such decentralization). At the same time, external economic pressures (e.g. globalization) place the task of national competitiveness in the global markets on the agenda, and increase incentives for fiscal and administrative decentralization. Thus, political and economic pressures create contradicting incentives, and in weighing costs and benefits, politicians in different authoritarian regimes make different choices that lead to variation in the form, degree and success of decentralization/centralization policies. In this article we compare authoritarian decentralization in Russia and Kazakhstan.