Emergency Physicians’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Psychiatric Emergencies in Makkah’s General Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Raghad M Ali,1 Abdulkarim A Aljabri,1 Nahla H Hariri,2 Ghadi S Bokhari,1 Shahad A Alturkistani,1 Nidaa A Albishri,1 Hamza A Alzahrani,1 Shuruq A Alghamdi,3 Renad T Alhazmi,1 Enas H Alfalogy2,4 1College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 2Community Medicine and Pilgrims Healthcare Department, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 3Directorate of Health Affairs, Eradah Complex for Mental Health, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 4Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez -Canal University, Ismalia, EgyptCorrespondence: Nahla H Hariri, Community Medicine and Pilgrims Healthcare Department, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia, Email [email protected]: This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of emergency physicians (EPs) related to psychiatric emergencies (PEs) in Makkah’s general hospitals.Sample and Methods: This study was an observational cross-sectional study using an online survey distributed to 138 EPs in the emergency departments (EDs) of six public hospitals in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia, between March 15 and May 1, 2023. A convenience sample was used for data collection. The questionnaire was developed after related surveys in the literature were reviewed.Results: 59.9% of the physicians were aged 20– 30 years. Most (68.8%) worked in hospitals that had psychiatric facilities. Regarding knowledge, only 30% of the emergency doctors were considered knowledgeable: the majority could identify PEs (79.7%), perform mental status examinations (71.0%), distinguish physical and mental symptoms (66.7%), and communicate with psychiatric patients (58.0%). However, only 52.9% could initiate management plans by prescribing psychiatric medication to patients. In relation to attitude, most physicians disagreed with the idea that healthcare practitioners do not need to advocate for psychiatric patients (67.4%), but many (62.3%) assumed that they do not have the responsibility to manage psychiatric patients, and they felt that conducting psychiatric evaluations in public hospitals is challenging because of the busy environment there. As regards practice, mentally ill patients (60.9%) were managed or referred by practices, and 56.5% of the EPs advised these patients upon discharge.Conclusion: The study showed that EPs have positive attitudes toward psychiatric patients, but their knowledge varied based on age, occupation levels, and years of experience. There were significant knowledge gaps, particularly regarding effective communication with psychiatric patients. Additionally, many EPs manage psychiatric patients without being aware of the psychiatric resources in their hospital. Improving medical school curricula and postgraduate training can enhance care. However, more research in this field is needed.Keywords: emergency departments, psychiatric patients, public hospitals, mental status examination

Keywords

• emergency departments
• psychiatric patients
• public hospitals
• mental status examination