World Journal of Surgical Oncology (Jun 2012)

Right Kocher’s incision: a feasible and effective incision for right hemicolectomy: a retrospective study

  • Theodosopoulos Theodosios,
  • Yiallourou Anneza I,
  • Dafnios Nicolaos,
  • Polymeneas George,
  • Papaconstantinou Ioannis,
  • Staikou Chrysoula,
  • Vassiliou Ioannis,
  • Smyrniotis Vassilis,
  • Fotopoulos Alexios

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-101
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
p. 101

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The choice of surgical incision is determined by access to the surgical field, particularly when an oncological resection is required. Special consideration is also given to other factors, such as postoperative pain and its sequelae, fewer complications in the early postoperative period and a lower occurrence of incisional hernias. The purpose of this study is to compare the right Kocher’s and the midline incision, for patients undergoing right hemicolectomy, by focusing on short- and longterm results. Methods Between 1995 and 2009, hospital records for 213 patients that had undergone a right hemicolectomy for a right- sided adenocarcinoma were retrospectively studied. 113 patients had been operated via a Kocher’s and 100 via a midline incision. Demographic details, operative data (explorative access to the peritoneal cavity, time of operation), recovery parameters (time with IV analgesic medication, time to first oral fluid intake, time to first solid meal, time to discharge), and oncological parameters (lymph node harvest, TNM stage and resection margins) were analyzed. Postoperative complications were also recorded. The two groups were retrospectively well matched with respect to demographic parameters and oncological status of the tumor. Results The median length of the midline incision was slightly longer (12 vs. 10 cm, p Conclusions The Kocher’s incision approach for right- sided colon cancer is technically feasible, safe and overall very well tolerated. It can achieve the same standards of tumor resection and surgical field accessibility as the midline approach, while reducing postoperative recovery.

Keywords