International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature (Feb 2021)

Presence of non-pulmonary vein foci in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing standard ablation of pulmonary vein isolation: Clinical characteristics and long-term ablation outcome

  • Yukihiro Inamura,
  • Junichi Nitta,
  • Osamu Inaba,
  • Akira Sato,
  • Tomomasa Takamiya,
  • Kazuya Murata,
  • Takashi Ikenouchi,
  • Toshikazu Kono,
  • Yutaka Matsumura,
  • Yoshihide Takahashi,
  • Masahiko Goya,
  • Tetsuo Sasano

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 32
p. 100717

Abstract

Read online

Background: The clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) resulting from non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with AF caused by non-PV triggers, localization of non-PV foci, clinical differences, and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation in each AF focus. Methods: A total of 2967 patients who underwent initial catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF were examined. After PV isolation, all patients underwent high-dose isoproterenol infusion to assess the existence of non-PV foci. Results: Non-PV foci were identified in 564 patients (19.2%). The localization of successfully ablated non-PV foci in 514 patients were the superior vena cava (SVC: 213 cases), interatrial septum (IAS: 125 cases), coronary sinus (CS: 98 cases), right atrium (RA: 125 cases), left atrium (LA: 114 cases), and unmappable (50 cases). Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, low body mass index (BMI), non-paroxysmal AF (PAF), and sick sinus syndrome were independent and significant indicators of non-PV foci. In the multivariate analysis of each AF focus, female gender, low BMI, and non-PAF were significant predictors of IAS and CS foci, RA and IAS foci, and CS foci, respectively. In addition, dilatation of the LA was significantly associated with LA foci, whereas RA, LA, IAS, and CS foci were associated with AF recurrence. Conclusion: These findings could help to identify patients at a higher risk of AF caused by non-PV triggers and clarify the clinical difference according to the localization of non-PV foci.

Keywords