Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Jul 2023)

P2y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1–3 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Yanqiao Yu,
  • Yanqiao Yu,
  • Deng Pan,
  • Deng Pan,
  • Ruina Bai,
  • Jinwen Luo,
  • Yu Tan,
  • Wenhui Duan,
  • Dazhuo Shi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1197161
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionIn patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whether short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitors confers benefits compared with standard DAPT remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 1–3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy in patients with CAD and CKD undergoing PCI.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a 1–3 months DAPT vs. DAPT in patients with CAD and CKD after PCI. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target-vessel revascularization, and stroke. The safety outcome was the major bleeding events, defined as a composite of TIMI major bleeding or Bleeding Academic Research and Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a fixed- or random-effects model depending on the heterogeneity among studies.ResultsFour RCTs including 20,468 patients (2,833 patients with CKD and 17,635 without CKD) comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with DAPT were included in our meta-analysis. Patients with CAD and CKD had higher risk of ischemic and bleeding events. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1–3 months of DAPT significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding compared to DAPT in CKD patients (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51–0.95, P = 0.02) and non-CKD patients (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49–0.89, P = 0.01). No significant difference regarding MACEs between P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and DAPT was found in CKD patients (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.59–1.31, P = 0.53) and non-CKD (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79–1.04, P = 0.17).ConclusionP2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1–3 months of DAPT was an effective strategy for lowering major bleeding complications without increasing the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with CAD and CKD undergoing PCI as compared with DAPTSystematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42022355228.

Keywords