Frontiers in Psychology (Jan 2015)

Hormones as Difference Makers in Cognitive and Socioemotional Aging Processes

  • Natalie eEbner,
  • Natalie eEbner,
  • Hayley eKamin,
  • Vanessa eDiaz,
  • Ronald A Cohen,
  • Kai eMacDonald

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01595
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5

Abstract

Read online

Aging is associated with well-recognized alterations in brain function, some of which are reflected in cognitive decline. While less appreciated, there is also considerable evidence of socioemotional changes later in life, some of which are beneficial. In this review, we examine age-related changes and individual differences in four neuroendocrine systems—cortisol, estrogen, testosterone, and oxytocin—as difference makers in these processes. This suite of interrelated hormonal systems actively coordinates regulatory processes in brain and behavior throughout development, and their level and function fluctuate during the aging process. Despite these facts, their specific impact in cognitive and socioemotional aging has received relatively limited study. It is known that chronically elevated levels of the stress hormone cortisol exert neurotoxic effects on the aging brain with negative impacts on cognition and socioemotional functioning. In contrast, the sex hormones estrogen and testosterone appear to have neuroprotective effects in cognitive aging, but may decrease prosociality. Higher levels of the neuropeptide oxytocin benefit socioemotional functioning, but little is known about the effects of oxytocin on cognition or about age-related changes in the oxytocin system. In this paper, we will review the role of these hormones in the context of cognitive and socioemotional aging. In particular, we address the aforementioned gap in the literature by: 1) examining both singular actions and interrelations of these four hormonal systems; 2) exploring their correlations and causal relationships with aspects of cognitive and socioemotional aging; and 3) considering multilevel internal and external influences on these hormone systems within the framework of explanatory pluralism. We conclude with a discussion of promising future research directions.

Keywords