Neurospine (Mar 2020)

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A 7-Letter Coding System That Supports Decision-Making for the Surgical Approach

  • Luca Papavero,
  • Gregor Schmeiser,
  • Ralph Kothe,
  • Bronek Boszczyk,
  • Oliver Heese,
  • Yoshiharu Kawaguchi,
  • Anna MacDowall,
  • Claes Olerud,
  • Nikolaos Paidakakos,
  • Anastasios Panagiotou,
  • Tobias Pitzen,
  • Marcus Richter,
  • K. Daniel Riew,
  • Aaron Stevenson,
  • Lee Tan,
  • Ryo Ueshima,
  • YH Yau,
  • Michael Mayer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1938010.005
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 164 – 171

Abstract

Read online

Objective To validate with a prospective study a decision-supporting coding system for the surgical approach for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy. Methods Ten cases were presented on an internet platform, including clinical and imaging data. A single-approach (G1), a choice between 2 (G2), or 3 approaches (G3) were options. Senior and junior spine surgeons analyzed 7 parameters: location and extension of the compression of the spinal cord, C-spine alignment and instability, general morbidity and bone diseases, and K-line and multilevel corpectomy. For each parameter, an anterior, posterior, or combined approach was suggested. The most frequent letter or the last letter (if C) of the resulting 7-letter code (7LC) suggested the surgical approach. Each surgeon performed 2 reads per case within 8 weeks. Results G1: Interrater reliability between junior surgeons improved from the first read (κ = 0.40) to the second (κ = 0.76, p < 0.001) but did not change between senior surgeons (κ = 0.85). The intrarater reliability was similar for junior (κ = 0.78) and senior (κ = 0.71) surgeons. G2: Junior/senior surgeons agreed completely (58%/62%), partially (24%/23%), or did not agree (18%/15%) with the 7LC choice. G3: junior/senior surgeons agreed completely (50%/50%) or partially (50%/50%) with the 7LC choice. Conclusion The 7LC showed good overall reliability. Junior surgeons went through a learning curve and converged to senior surgeons in the second read. The 7LC helps less experienced surgeons to analyze, in a structured manner, the relevant clinical and imaging parameters influencing the choice of the surgical approach, rather than simply pointing out the only correct one.

Keywords