Biogeosciences (May 2022)

Sources of nitrous oxide and the fate of mineral nitrogen in subarctic permafrost peat soils

  • J. Gil,
  • J. Gil,
  • M. E. Marushchak,
  • M. E. Marushchak,
  • T. Rütting,
  • E. M. Baggs,
  • T. Pérez,
  • A. Novakovskiy,
  • T. Trubnikova,
  • D. Kaverin,
  • P. J. Martikainen,
  • C. Biasi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2683-2022
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19
pp. 2683 – 2698

Abstract

Read online

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from permafrost-affected terrestrial ecosystems have received little attention, largely because they have been thought to be negligible. Recent studies, however, have shown that there are habitats in the subarctic tundra emitting N2O at high rates, such as bare peat (BP) surfaces on permafrost peatlands. Nevertheless, the processes behind N2O production in these high-emission habitats are poorly understood. In this study, we established an in situ 15N-labeling experiment with two main objectives: (1) to partition the microbial sources of N2O emitted from BP surfaces on permafrost peatlands and (2) to study the fate of ammonium and nitrate in these soils and in adjacent vegetated peat (VP) surfaces showing low N2O emissions. Our results confirm the hypothesis that denitrification is mostly responsible for the high N2O emissions from BP. During the study period, denitrification contributed ∼ 79 % of the total N2O emissions from BP, whereas the contribution from ammonia oxidation was less (about 19 %). Both gross N mineralization and gross nitrification rates were higher in BP than in VP, with high C/N ratios and a low water content likely limiting N transformation processes and, consequently, N2O production in the latter soil type. Our results show that multiple factors contribute to high N2O production in BP surfaces on permafrost peatlands, with the most important factors being the absence of plants, an intermediate to high water content and a low C/N ratio, which all affect the mineral-N availability for soil microbes, including those producing N2O. The process understanding produced here is important for the development of process models that can be used to evaluate future permafrost–N feedbacks to the climate system.