The Journal of Headache and Pain (Jun 2023)

Effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients over 65 years: a real-life multicentre analysis of 162 patients

  • Albert Muñoz-Vendrell,
  • Sergio Campoy,
  • Edoardo Caronna,
  • Alicia Alpuente,
  • Marta Torres-Ferrus,
  • Candela Nieves Castellanos,
  • Marina Olivier,
  • Jaume Campdelacreu,
  • Joan Prat,
  • Javier Camiña Muñiz,
  • Francisco José Molina Martínez,
  • Ane Mínguez-Olaondo,
  • Marta Ruibal Salgado,
  • Sonia Santos Lasaosa,
  • María Pilar Navarro Pérez,
  • Noemí Morollón,
  • Alba López Bravo,
  • Luis Miguel Cano Sánchez,
  • Sonia María García-Sánchez,
  • Jésica García-Ull,
  • Laura Rubio-Flores,
  • Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez,
  • Sonia Quintas,
  • Ana Echavarría Íñiguez,
  • Sendoa Gil Luque,
  • María Victoria Castro-Sánchez,
  • Vanesa Adell Ortega,
  • Jessica García Alhama,
  • Nuria Berrocal-Izquierdo,
  • Robert Belvís,
  • Samuel Díaz-Insa,
  • Patricia Pozo-Rosich,
  • Mariano Huerta-Villanueva

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01585-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies have shown notable effectiveness and tolerability in migraine patients; however, data on their use in elderly patients is still lacking, as clinical trials have implicit age restrictions and real-world evidence is scarce. In this study, we aimed to describe the safety and effectiveness of erenumab, galcanezumab and fremanezumab in migraine patients over 65 years old in real-life. Methods In this observational real-life study, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 18 different headache units in Spain was performed. Migraine patients who started treatment with any anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody after the age of 65 years were included. Primary endpoints were reduction in monthly migraine days after 6 months of treatment and the presence of adverse effects. Secondary endpoints were reductions in headache and medication intake frequencies by months 3 and 6, response rates, changes in patient-reported outcomes and reasons for discontinuation. As a subanalysis, reduction in monthly migraine days and proportion of adverse effects were also compared among the three monoclonal antibodies. Results A total of 162 patients were included, median age 68 years (range 65–87), 74.1% women. 42% had dyslipidaemia, 40.3% hypertension, 8% diabetes, and 6.2% previous cardiovascular ischaemic disease. The reduction in monthly migraine days at month 6 was 10.1 ± 7.3 days. A total of 25.3% of patients presented adverse effects, all of them mild, with only two cases of blood pressure increase. Headache and medication intake frequencies were significantly reduced, and patient-reported outcomes were improved. The proportions of responders were 68%, 57%, 33% and 9% for reductions in monthly migraine days ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100%, respectively. A total of 72.8% of patients continued with the treatment after 6 months. The reduction in migraine days was similar for the different anti-CGRP treatments, but fewer adverse effects were detected with fremanezumab (7.7%). Conclusions Anti-CGRP mAbs are safe and effective treatments in migraine patients over 65 years old in real-life clinical practice. Graphical Abstract

Keywords