Applied Sciences (Mar 2024)

Surface Roughness Evaluation of Pre- Versus Post-Crystallization Polish of Two High-Strength Silicate Ceramics for Chairside CAD/CAM Technology

  • Felipe Tarosso Rea,
  • Andre Valcanaia,
  • Pilar Herrera-Fierro,
  • Manish Verma,
  • Gisele de Faria Neiva

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072768
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 7
p. 2768

Abstract

Read online

This in vitro study evaluated the surface roughness (Sa) of two high-strength silicate ceramics, lithium disilicate IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent (LDS group), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate Vita Suprinity, VITA Zahnfabrik (ZLS group). The surface roughness was investigated before and after milling using different polishing systems and timings relative to the final crystallization of the ceramics. Forty-eight samples per group were polished by a single calibrated operator using two polishing systems: Dialite LD (Brasseler) and Lithium Silicate Polishers (Meisinger) for the LDS group and Dialite LD (Brasseler) and Vita Suprinity Polishing Set Technical (VITA Zahnfabrik) for the ZLS group, both pre- and post-crystallization. Surface roughness was measured using a confocal laser microscope (OLS4000 LEXT/Olympus), with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) used to evaluate surface morphological changes. Significant differences in Sa values were found between baseline groups, with ZLS exhibiting lower values. All polishing methods significantly reduced surface roughness compared to baseline (p ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were found in LDS samples when polishing pre- or post-crystallization (p = 0.129), while for ZLS samples, post-crystallization polishing achieved significantly smoother surfaces (p < 0.001). The study concluded that the choice of polishing system and timing did not significantly affect surface roughness for LDS. However, it is recommended that post-crystallization polishing be performed for the optimal smoothness of ZLS. This study aimed to evaluate the post-milling polishing procedures of CAD/CAM high-strength restorations, emphasizing the importance of an optimal surface roughness to prevent issues such as increased risk of abrasion on opposing teeth, enhanced plaque adhesion, and mechanical failures. Investigating these polishing techniques enables clinicians to optimize clinical performance, thereby improving the quality and longevity of high-strength silicate ceramics.

Keywords