Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Feb 2019)

What Is the Most Beautiful Facial Proportion in the 21st Century? Comparative Study among Miss Universe, Miss Universe Thailand, Neoclassical Canons, and Facial Golden Ratios

  • Chairat Burusapat, FRCST,
  • Pattariya Lekdaeng, FRCST

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002044
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 2
p. e2044

Abstract

Read online

Background:. An ideal facial proportion has been attempted since the ancient times. However, modern facial proportions of the most beautiful women in the 21st century are unavailable and have never been determined. Methods:. A retrospective review of the photographs of Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe from 2001 to 2015 was conducted. All photographs were searched from Internet websites. Twenty-six dominant points were identified. Comparisons of the facial proportion among Miss Universe Thailand, Miss Universe, neoclassical canons, and facial golden ratios were performed. Results:. Sixteen Miss Universe Thailand and 16 Miss Universe were included. Nine points of facial proportions were found to be statistically significant between Miss Universe Thailand and neoclassical canons. Miss Universe Thailand showed wider nasofrontal angle, thinner lower-upper lip height ratio, and less chin projection. Ten points of facial proportions were found to be statistically significant between Miss Universe and neoclassical canons. Miss Universe showed wider nasofrontal and nasofacial angle, more nasal tip projection, and thinner lower-upper lip height ratio. Seven points of facial analysis were found to be statistically significant between Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe groups. Of the 16 facial golden ratios, 12 demonstrated statistical significance in both the Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe groups. Conclusions:. Modern facial proportions of beauty are different from the past. Photogrammetic analysis demonstrated longer forehead, thinner lower-upper lip height proportion, wider interala-medial canthus width proportion, and wider nasofrontal angle compared with previous references. Furthermore, facial golden ratios were statistically significantly invalid in modern facial proportions of beauty.