Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile
Iara Yamila Taito-Vicenti
Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Catalina Gracia González-Xuriguera
Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile
Cristhian Carvajal
Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile
Juan Víctor Ariel Franco
Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Cristóbal Loézar
Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Salud (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile; Centro Asociado Universidad de Valparaíso, Cochrane Chile, Viña del Mar, Chile
Healthcare professionals make decisions in a context of uncertainty. When making a diagnosis, relevant patient characteristics are categorized to fit a particular condition that explains what the patient is experiencing. During the diagnostic process, tools such as the medical interview, physical examination, and other complementary tests support this categorization. These tools, known as diagnostic tests, allow professionals to estimate the probability of the presence or absence of the suspected medical condition. The usefulness of diagnostic tests varies for each clinical condition, and studies of accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and diagnostic impact (impact on health outcomes) are used to evaluate them. In this article, the general theoretical and practical concepts about diagnostic tests in human beings are addressed, considering their historical background, their relationship with probability theories, and their practical utility with illustrative examples.