Frontiers in Oncology (Nov 2023)

Locally advanced breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery and other factors linked to overall survival after neoadjuvant treatment

  • Gabriela Bezerra Nobrega,
  • Gabriela Bezerra Nobrega,
  • Bruna Salani Mota,
  • Bruna Salani Mota,
  • Gabriela Boufelli de Freitas,
  • Gabriela Boufelli de Freitas,
  • Jonathan Yugo Maesaka,
  • Jonathan Yugo Maesaka,
  • Rosa Maria Salani Mota,
  • Rodrigo Goncalves,
  • Rodrigo Goncalves,
  • Angela Francisca Trinconi,
  • Angela Francisca Trinconi,
  • Marcos Desidério Ricci,
  • Marcos Desidério Ricci,
  • José Roberto Piato,
  • José Roberto Piato,
  • José Maria Soares-Jr,
  • Edmund Chada Baracat,
  • José Roberto Filassi,
  • José Roberto Filassi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1293288
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundRecent data suggest that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may positively impact overall survival (OS) in early breast cancer. However, the role of BCS in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains uncertain.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 530 LABC patients who underwent surgery after NAT between 2010 and 2015. Outcomes examined included OS, distant recurrence rates (DRR), and loco-regional recurrence rates (LRRs).ResultsAmong the 927 breast cancer patients who received NAT, 530 were eligible for our study. Of these, 24.6% underwent BCS, while 75.4% underwent mastectomy (MS). The median follow-up duration was 79 months. BCS patients exhibited a higher pathological complete response (PCR) rate compared to those who underwent MS (22.3% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). The 6-year OS rates for BCS and MS were 81.5% and 62%, respectively (p < 0.000). In multivariate OS analysis, MS was associated with worse outcomes (OR 1.678; 95% CI 1.069–2.635; p = 0.024), as was body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.031; 95% CI 1.006–1.058; p = 0.017), and stage IIIB or IIIC (OR 2.450; 95% CI 1.561–3.846; p < 0.000). Conversely, PCR (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.220–0.801; p = 0.008) was associated with improved survival. DRR was significantly lower in BCS (15.4%) compared to MS (36.8%) (OR 0.298; 95% CI 0.177–0.504). LRRs were comparable between BCS (9.2%) and MS (9.5%) (OR 0.693; 95% CI 0.347–1.383).ConclusionOur findings suggest that BCS is oncologically safe, even for patients with large lesions, and is associated with superior OS rates compared to MS. Additionally, lower BMI, lower pretreatment stage, and achieving PCR were associated with improved survival outcomes.

Keywords