Scientific Reports (Apr 2024)

A national evaluation analysis and expert interview study of real-world data sources for research and healthcare decision-making

  • Veronika Mikl,
  • Dejan Baltic,
  • Thomas Czypionka,
  • Alexander Degelsegger-Márquez,
  • Nikolaus Forgó,
  • Ghazaleh Gouya-Lechner,
  • Arnold Herzog,
  • Peter Klimek,
  • David Benjamin Lumenta,
  • Bernhard Mraz,
  • Herwig Ostermann,
  • Robert Scharinger,
  • Tanja Stamm,
  • Michael Strassnig,
  • Markus Zeitlinger,
  • Johannes Pleiner-Duxneuner

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59475-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Real-world data (RWD) can provide intel (real-world evidence, RWE) for research and development, as well as policy and regulatory decision-making along the full spectrum of health care. Despite calls from global regulators for international collaborations to integrate RWE into regulatory decision-making and to bridge knowledge gaps, some challenges remain. In this work, we performed an evaluation of Austrian RWD sources using a multilateral query approach, crosschecked against previously published RWD criteria and conducted direct interviews with representative RWD source samples. This article provides an overview of 73 out of 104 RWD sources in a national legislative setting where major attempts are made to enable secondary use of RWD (e.g. law on the organisation of research, "Forschungsorganisationsgesetz"). We were able to detect omnipresent challenges associated with data silos, variable standardisation efforts and governance issues. Our findings suggest a strong need for a national health data strategy and data governance framework, which should inform researchers, as well as policy- and decision-makers, to improve RWD-based research in the healthcare sector to ultimately support actual regulatory decision-making and provide strategic information for governmental health data policies.

Keywords