PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Psychometric properties of the sit-to-stand test for patients with pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review protocol

  • Natália Lopes Cardoso,
  • Joceline Ferezini de Sá,
  • Larissa F. E. do Nascimento,
  • Luciana A. Mendes,
  • Selma Bruno,
  • Rodrigo Torres-Castro,
  • Guilherme A. F. Fregonezi,
  • Vanessa R. Resqueti

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complex syndrome characterized by increased pulmonary arterial pressure and classified into five groups, according to dyspnea on exertion and systemic muscle dysfunction. These symptoms can be identified using the sit-to-stand test (STS), which indirectly evaluates exercise tolerance and lower limb muscle strength. Previous studies used the STS in PH; however, psychometric properties to understand and validate this test were not described for patients with PH. Objective To evaluate the psychometric properties (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) of different STS protocols in patients with PH. Methods and analyses This is a systematic review protocol that will include studies using STS in patients with PH. Searches will be conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases following PICOT mnemonic strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). Rayyan software will be used for study selection. The Risk of bias will be assessed using the Consensus‐Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) tool, while the quality of evidence will be assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Two researchers will independently conduct the study, and a third researcher will be consulted in case of disagreement. The psychometric properties will be evaluated according to the COSMIN. This protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, no. CRD42021244271). Conclusion This systematic review will attempt to identify and show the available evidence on STS for different groups of PH and report validity, reliability, and responsiveness of different protocols.