The Characteristics and Potential Risks of Neonicotinoid Residues in Soils of Different Types of Land Use in Hangzhou

Abstract

Due to the wide existence of neonicotinoid insecticides (neonics) and their potential impact on ecosystems and human health, they have received special attention in recent years. Soil is not only a sink of neonics but also a source of neonics, so it plays a key role in the ubiquity of neonics in the environment. The purpose of this research was to compare neonics residues in soils of different types of land use and estimate their exposure to different populations via ingestion. A total of 130 soil samples from six different types were collected. The concentrations of seven neonics in soil were simultaneous determined using isotope-dilution ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The results showed that at least one neonic was analyzed in all samples. The highest average concentration was 3.42 ng/g (clothianidin), followed by 3.39 ng/g (thiamethoxam), 3.06 ng/g (acetamiprid), 2.84 ng/g (imidacloprid), 2.66 ng/g (nitenpyram), 2.43 ng/g (thiacloprid), and 1.89 ng/g (dinotefuran). IMI and ACE were the most commonly found neonics in soil. The neonic levels in different soils varied significantly. The integrated neonic residue in cropland was much higher than that in other types of land. The risk assessment revealed that the average daily dose (ADD) through ingestion contact with soil was acceptable to children and adults. With the increasing evidence that neonics could cause a variety of toxic effects on mammals and humans, ingestion exposure caused by neonics in soil should also receive continuous attention in future studies.

Keywords

• Neonicotinoids
• Soil
• Land use types
• Ingestion exposure
• Relative potency factor