BMC Infectious Diseases (Dec 2020)

Describing nearly two decades of Chagas disease in Germany and the lessons learned: a retrospective study on screening, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of Trypanosoma cruzi infection from 2000 – 2018

  • Jessica Michelle Guggenbühl Noller,
  • Guenter Froeschl,
  • Philip Eisermann,
  • Johannes Jochum,
  • Stefanie Theuring,
  • Ingrid Reiter-Owona,
  • Alfred Lennart Bissinger,
  • Michael Hoelscher,
  • Abhishek Bakuli,
  • Franz-Josef Falkner von Sonnenburg,
  • Camilla Rothe,
  • Gisela Bretzel,
  • Pedro Albajar-Viñas,
  • Lise Grout,
  • Michael Pritsch

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05600-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The highly complex and largely neglected Chagas disease (CD) has become a global health problem due to population movements between Latin America and non-endemic countries, as well as non-vectorial transmission routes. Data on CD testing and treatment from routine patient care in Germany of almost two decades was collected and analysed. Methods German laboratories offering diagnostics for chronic Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) infection in routine patient care were identified. All retrievable data on tests performed during the years of 2000–2018 were analysed. Additional clinical information regarding patients diagnosed with CD was collected through questionnaires. Results Five German laboratories with diagnostics for T. cruzi infection in routine patient care were identified. Centres in Hamburg and Munich offered two independent serological tests to confirm the CD diagnosis, as recommended by WHO during the entire time period 2000–2018. Overall, a total of n = 10,728 independent tests involving n = 5991 individuals were identified with a progressive increase in testing rates over time, only n = 130 (16.0%) of the tested individuals with known nationality came from CD endemic countries. Of all test units conducted at the included institutes, a total of n = 347/10,728 (3.2%) tests on CD were positive, of which n = 200/347 (57.6%) were ELISA, n = 133/347 (38.3%) IFT, n = 10/347 (2.9%) PCR, and n = 4/347 (1.2%) RDT. Of the n = 5991 individuals only n = 81 (1.4%) with chronic infection were identified, n = 52 females and n = 28 males. Additional clinical information could only be collected from n = 47. Conclusion The results of this study give insight into the deployment of screening, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of T. cruzi over the last two decades in Germany and existing deficits therein; the creation of guidelines for Germany could be a step forward to improve the existing gaps.

Keywords