ESC Heart Failure (Oct 2024)

Redefining anthracycline‐related subclinical cardiotoxicity: ‘Absolute’ and ‘relative’ change in longitudinal strain

  • Andrew Terluk,
  • Luke Stefani,
  • Anita Boyd,
  • Kim Vo,
  • Karen Byth,
  • Rina Hui,
  • David Richards,
  • Liza Thomas

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14884
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 5
pp. 3210 – 3221

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Aims Anthracycline chemotherapy (AC) for breast cancer can cause cancer therapy‐related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) with resultant heart failure, traditionally defined as a reduction in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction on echocardiography. In recent years, global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) has been used to identify subclinical cardiac dysfunction prior to development of overt CTRCD. Recent harmonized guidelines have incorporated GLS into definitions for CTRCD to identify cardiac dysfunction and inform decisions regarding cardioprotective strategies. Methods and results We evaluated subclinical dysfunction in breast cancer patients treated with AC and determined the echocardiographic and patient factors associated with significant GLS changes. One hundred fourteen HER2 negative patients treated with AC were prospectively recruited and underwent serial echocardiograms (LVEF and LVGLS) at three time points (prior to AC, 3 months, and 1 year). CTRCD was defined as an asymptomatic reduction in LVEF of 10% or symptomatic drop of 5% to LVEF <53%. Subclinical LV dysfunction was defined as a reduction of ≥10% in GLS compared with baseline, recognizing that this cut off identified an ‘at risk cohort’ rather than patients with established CTRCD. No participant demonstrated CTRCD by reduction in LVEF. Forty‐three patients (38%) demonstrated a ≥10% relative reduction in GLS at 12 months; 20/43 (47%) had a reduced absolute GLS to <16%, and were older, had hypertension, increased LV mass, lower baseline e′ velocity and GLS. GLS ≥20.5% at baseline yielded a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 87% for a normal GLS (i.e., ≥16%) at 1 year despite a ≥10% reduction from baseline. Conclusions We present a stepwise evaluation for subclinical LV dysfunction using both a relative reduction in GLS combined with an absolute reduction in GLS. We believe our findings may re‐stratify patients with a high baseline GLS into a lower risk group despite transient relative GLS decrements ≥10%.

Keywords