Frontiers in Veterinary Science (Jul 2023)
Intensive neurorehabilitation and allogeneic stem cells transplantation in canine degenerative myelopathy
- Débora Gouveia,
- Débora Gouveia,
- Débora Gouveia,
- Jéssica Correia,
- Jéssica Correia,
- Ana Cardoso,
- Ana Cardoso,
- Carla Carvalho,
- Ana Catarina Oliveira,
- Ana Catarina Oliveira,
- António Almeida,
- Óscar Gamboa,
- Lénio Ribeiro,
- Mariana Branquinho,
- Mariana Branquinho,
- Mariana Branquinho,
- Ana Sousa,
- Ana Sousa,
- Ana Sousa,
- Bruna Lopes,
- Bruna Lopes,
- Bruna Lopes,
- Patrícia Sousa,
- Patrícia Sousa,
- Patrícia Sousa,
- Alícia Moreira,
- Alícia Moreira,
- Alícia Moreira,
- André Coelho,
- André Coelho,
- André Coelho,
- Alexandra Rêma,
- Alexandra Rêma,
- Alexandra Rêma,
- Rui Alvites,
- Rui Alvites,
- Rui Alvites,
- Rui Alvites,
- António Ferreira,
- António Ferreira,
- António Ferreira,
- Ana Colette Maurício,
- Ana Colette Maurício,
- Ana Colette Maurício,
- Ângela Martins,
- Ângela Martins,
- Ângela Martins
Affiliations
- Débora Gouveia
- Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Arrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Setubal, Portugal
- Débora Gouveia
- Superior School of Health, Protection and Animal Welfare, Polytechnic Institute of Lusophony, Lisboa, Portugal
- Débora Gouveia
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal
- Jéssica Correia
- Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Arrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Setubal, Portugal
- Jéssica Correia
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal
- Ana Cardoso
- Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Arrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Setubal, Portugal
- Ana Cardoso
- Superior School of Health, Protection and Animal Welfare, Polytechnic Institute of Lusophony, Lisboa, Portugal
- Carla Carvalho
- Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Arrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Setubal, Portugal
- Ana Catarina Oliveira
- Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Arrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Setubal, Portugal
- Ana Catarina Oliveira
- Superior School of Health, Protection and Animal Welfare, Polytechnic Institute of Lusophony, Lisboa, Portugal
- António Almeida
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- Óscar Gamboa
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- Lénio Ribeiro
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal
- Mariana Branquinho
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Mariana Branquinho
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Mariana Branquinho
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Ana Sousa
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Ana Sousa
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Ana Sousa
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Bruna Lopes
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Bruna Lopes
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Bruna Lopes
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Patrícia Sousa
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Patrícia Sousa
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Patrícia Sousa
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Alícia Moreira
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Alícia Moreira
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Alícia Moreira
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- André Coelho
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- André Coelho
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- André Coelho
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Alexandra Rêma
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Alexandra Rêma
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Alexandra Rêma
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Rui Alvites
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Rui Alvites
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Rui Alvites
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Rui Alvites
- Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde (IUCS), Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário (CESPU), Gandra, Portugal
- António Ferreira
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- António Ferreira
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- António Ferreira
- CIISA - Centro Interdisciplinar-Investigáo em Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Av. Universi dade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Ana Colette Maurício
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salaza, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Ana Colette Maurício
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal, Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Ana Colette Maurício
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), Lisboa, Portugal
- Ângela Martins
- Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Arrábida Animal Rehabilitation Center, Setubal, Portugal
- Ângela Martins
- Superior School of Health, Protection and Animal Welfare, Polytechnic Institute of Lusophony, Lisboa, Portugal
- Ângela Martins
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1192744
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 10
Abstract
IntroductionDegenerative myelopathy (DM) is a neurodegenerative spinal cord disease with upper motor neurons, with progressive and chronic clinical signs, similar to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). DM has a complex etiology mainly associated with SOD1 gene mutation and its toxic role, with no specific treatment. Daily intensive rehabilitation showed survival time near 8 months but most animals are euthanized 6–12 months after clinical signs onset.MethodsThis prospective controlled blinded cohort clinical study aims to evaluate the neural regeneration response ability of DM dogs subjected to an intensive neurorehabilitation protocol with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplantation. In total, 13 non-ambulatory (OFS 6 or 8) dogs with homozygous genotype DM/DM and diagnosed by exclusion were included. All were allocated to the intensive neurorehabilitation with MSCs protocol (INSCP) group (n = 8) or to the ambulatory rehabilitation protocol (ARP) group (n = 5), which differ in regard to training intensity, modalities frequency, and MSCs transplantation. The INSCP group was hospitalized for 1 month (T0 to T1), followed by MSCs transplantation (T1) and a second month (T2), whereas the ARP group was under ambulatory treatment for the same 2 months.ResultsSurvival mean time of total population was 375 days, with 438 days for the INSCP group and 274 for the ARP group, with a marked difference on the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. When comparing the literature's results, there was also a clear difference in the one-sample t-test (p = 0.013) with an increase in time of approximately 70%. OFS classifications between groups at each time point were significantly different (p = 0.008) by the one-way ANOVA and the independent sample t-test.DiscussionThis INSCP showed to be safe, feasible, and a possibility for a long progression of DM dogs with quality of life and functional improvement. This study should be continued.
Keywords
- mesenchymal stem cells
- intensive neurorehabilitation
- dogs
- degenerative myelopathy
- locomotor training
- electrical stimulation