Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Nov 2020)

Velopharyngeal Space Assessment in Patients Undergoing Le Fort 1 Maxillary Advancement

  • Eli Saleh, MD, MSc,
  • Joseph Saleh,
  • Gabriel Beauchemin, MD, FRCSC,
  • Ramy El-Jalbout, MD, FRCPC,
  • Daniel E. Borsuk, MD, FRCSC, FACS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003232
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 11
p. e3232

Abstract

Read online

Background:. The effects of maxillary advancement on velopharyngeal anatomy have primarily been studied using lateral cephalometric radiographs. However, with recent advances in orthognathic surgery, there is an increased need for more detailed and precise imaging such as computerized tomographic (CT) scan reconstructions, to help in surgical planning and to measure outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the pre- and post-operative velopharyngeal anatomic configuration modifications as measured on CT scans. Methods:. This is a retrospective cohort study of 44 patients with and without cleft palate who were treated with maxillary advancement. The pre- and post-operative CT scans were compared with respect to pre-established landmarks. Linear distances, cross-sectional areas, and volumes were measured using 3-dimensional CT scan reconstructions. Results:. For the linear distances measured, a statistically significant difference was found when comparing the pre- and post-operative measures of the narrowest part of the nasopharynx and the narrowest part of the retropalatal airway space (P = 0.001 and 0.026, respectively). Retropalatal cross-sectional areas, nasopharyngeal cross-sectional areas, and the volumetric assessment of the nasopharyngeal space showed no statistically significant differences when comparing pre- and post-operative scans (P < 0.05). Mean changes in the measures did not differ over time (pre- and post-operative) depending on whether there was a prior history of cleft palate repair. Conclusions:. Although structural modifications of the pharyngeal space are inherent to maxillary advancement, its surface area and volume do not significantly change. The use of 3-dimensional reconstruction using CT scans should be the first choice for evaluation of the upper airway.