PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Prediction of auditory and visual p300 brain-computer interface aptitude.

  • Sebastian Halder,
  • Eva Maria Hammer,
  • Sonja Claudia Kleih,
  • Martin Bogdan,
  • Wolfgang Rosenstiel,
  • Niels Birbaumer,
  • Andrea Kübler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053513
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2
p. e53513

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs) provide a non-muscular communication channel for patients with late-stage motoneuron disease (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)) or otherwise motor impaired people and are also used for motor rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Differences in the ability to use a BCI vary from person to person and from session to session. A reliable predictor of aptitude would allow for the selection of suitable BCI paradigms. For this reason, we investigated whether P300 BCI aptitude could be predicted from a short experiment with a standard auditory oddball.MethodsForty healthy participants performed an electroencephalography (EEG) based visual and auditory P300-BCI spelling task in a single session. In addition, prior to each session an auditory oddball was presented. Features extracted from the auditory oddball were analyzed with respect to predictive power for BCI aptitude.ResultsCorrelation between auditory oddball response and P300 BCI accuracy revealed a strong relationship between accuracy and N2 amplitude and the amplitude of a late ERP component between 400 and 600 ms. Interestingly, the P3 amplitude of the auditory oddball response was not correlated with accuracy.ConclusionsEvent-related potentials recorded during a standard auditory oddball session moderately predict aptitude in an audiory and highly in a visual P300 BCI. The predictor will allow for faster paradigm selection.SignificanceOur method will reduce strain on patients because unsuccessful training may be avoided, provided the results can be generalized to the patient population.