Low-volume combined aerobic and resistance high-intensity interval training in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the effects of novel, time-efficient, low-volume combined aerobic and resistance high-intensity interval training (C-HIIT), and current exercise guidelines (210 min/week of combined moderate-intensity continuous training (C-MICT)), with waitlist control (CON) on glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).Methods Sixty-nine low-active people with T2D were randomised to 8 weeks of supervised C-HIIT (78 min/week), supervised C-MICT (210 min/week), or waitlist CON. Those in waitlist CON were re-randomised to supervised C-HIIT/C-MICT at week 8. Following 8 weeks of supervised training, participants completed 10 months of self-directed exercise. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 8 and month 12. Participants in waitlist CON were only included in the exercise groups for the month 12 analysis. Analyses were completed using intention-to-treat analysis of covariance (n=69; week 8) and linear mixed modelling (n=63; month 12).Results Compared with CON, at week 8, HbA1c decreased in C-HIIT (adjusted mean difference: –0.7% (95% CI –1.3, –0.2%)) and C-MICT (–1.2% (–1.9, –0.6%)). There were also improvements in C-HIIT and C-MICT versus CON at week 8 for fat mass (–1.9 (–3.1, –0.6) and –1.5 (–2.6, –0.4) kg, respectively), lean mass (1.5 (0.8, 2.3) and 0.9 (0.1, 1.7) kg), and exercise capacity (124 (77, 171) and 49 (5, 93) s). At month 12, adherence was low, and most measures returned to baseline.Conclusions Low-volume C-HIIT (78 min/week) and C-MICT (210 min/week) improved glycaemic control, body composition and exercise capacity similarly over 8 weeks in people with T2D. However, at month 12, improvements were not maintained following self-directed exercise. Regardless, these data suggest that supervised low-volume C-HIIT is a time-efficient and effective strategy for improving outcomes in T2D.