Frontiers in Genetics (Jul 2024)

The association between IGF-1 levels and four types of osteoarthritis: a bidirectional and two-step mendelian randomization study

  • Xiaohan Pan,
  • Xiaohan Pan,
  • Minghuang Cheng,
  • Minghuang Cheng,
  • Dongxu Li,
  • Dongxu Li,
  • Zeyu Liu,
  • Zeyu Liu,
  • Qi Yao,
  • Qi Yao,
  • Wei Jiang,
  • Wei Jiang,
  • Xiaojun Zhang,
  • Xiaojun Zhang,
  • Jie Hao,
  • Jie Hao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1366138
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundInsulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) plays a crucial role in the growth and metabolic functions of various tissues and cells in the body. Recently, there has been increased attention to the association between IGF-1 and osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is controversy in current research regarding the correlation between IGF-1 levels and OA. Furthermore, the specific manner in which Body Mass Index (BMI), a key risk factor for OA, mediates the impact of IGF-1 levels on OA remains unclear.ObjectThis study aimed to investigate the bidirectional causal link between IGF-1 levels and OA in four body regions, and to explore how BMI influences the impact of IGF-1 on these types of OA.MethodTwo-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) and its combined forms were utilized to investigate the bidirectional relationship between IGF-1 levels and four types of OA, as well as the mediating role of BMI in the impact of IGF-1 levels on OA. Data from various Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and multiple analytical methods, including inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger regression, and weighted median were utilized. Sensitivity analyses, such as MR-Egger intercept, Cochran Q test, leave-one-out, and MR-PRESSO, were conducted to ensure the robustness of the results.ResultsHigher IGF-1 levels are correlated with an increased risk for knee (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; p = 1.49e-01; q = 9.86e-03), hip (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06–1.20; p = 7.61e-05; q = 7.44e-05), and hand OA (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01–1.17; p = 1.88e-02; q = 1.15e-02), but not spine OA but not spine OA (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.99–1.10; p = 9.20e-02; q = 5.52e-02). Different types of OA do not affect IGF-1 levels. BMI mediates the increase in OA risk associated with higher IGF-1, including indirect spine OA risk through BMI.ConclusionThe study elucidates the bidirectional causality between IGF-1 levels and OA in various body parts, highlighting BMI’s mediating role in the impact of IGF-1 levels on OA. This provides valuable insights for OA prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Future research will expand our study to include a broader spectrum of ethnicities and explore the underlying mechanisms involved.

Keywords