The effectiveness and safety of posaconazole enteric-coated tablet versus oral suspension in invasive fungal infections

Abstract

Abstract Posaconazole enteric-coated tablet and oral suspension are two oral drugs in the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). This study compared the effectiveness and safety between posaconazole enteric-coated tablet and oral suspension, and provided a real world basis for the clinical practice. A retrospective cohort study was performed on IFIs patients treated with posaconazole enteric–coated tablet or oral suspension. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, treatment discontinuation rate and clinical effective rate. The secondary endpoints were adverse events incidence (liver dysfunction, renal dysfunction and hypokalemia). One hundred and forty-four patients were totally included and divided into enteric-coated tablet group (n = 46) and oral suspension group (n = 98). There was no significant difference in effectiveness and safety between two groups. The female (OR = 0.130, P = 0.018) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.242, P = 0.003) were independently associated with combined in-hospital mortality/treatment discontinuation rate. The renal replacement therapy (OR = 10.071, P = 0.006), hypoalbuminemia (OR = 6.646, P = 0.002) and posaconazole duration (OR = 1.119, P = 0.002) were risk factors for liver dysfunction. The posaconazole enteric-coated tablet has comparable effectiveness and safety with oral suspension in IFIs, which need large-scale cases studies to confirm in the future.

Keywords

• Posaconazole enteric-coated tablet
• Posaconazole oral suspension
• Invasive fungal infections
• Effectiveness
• Safety