Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation (Apr 2024)

Thinner Tibial Spine Fracture Fragments Are Associated With Risk of Fixation Failure

  • Gregory Benes, B.S.,
  • Daniel Badin, M.D.,
  • Majd Marrache, M.D.,
  • Rushyuan Jay Lee, M.D.

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 2
p. 100878

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: To determine the rate of and risk factors for failure of tibial spine fracture (TSF) repair. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients aged 18 years or younger with TSF who underwent arthroscopic repair performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon at a large tertiary academic hospital between 2015 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, injury, fracture, and surgical characteristics were collected. Coronal length and sagittal length and height of the fracture fragment were measured on preoperative plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Results: Of 25 patients who underwent arthroscopic reduction with internal fixation of TSFs, 2 (8%) experienced fixation failure. In 16 (64%), internal fixation was performed with suture anchors, whereas 8 (32%) underwent internal fixation with screws. There were 19 male patients (76%). There were no differences in demographic factors (age, race, sex, and body mass index), injury characteristics (laterality, mechanism of injury, and activity causing injury), modified Meyers-McKeever fracture classification, or method of internal fixation between the group with fixation failure and the group without failure. Coronal length (14.2 mm vs 18 mm, P = .17) and sagittal length (13.9 mm vs 18.7 mm, P = .17) of the fracture fragment also did not differ significantly between groups. Sagittal height of the fracture fragment was thinner in patients with failure of fixation (4.3 mm) than in those without failure (8 mm) (P = .02). Conclusions: Decreased bone thickness of the displaced fragment was associated with an increased likelihood of fixation failure. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.