Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (Feb 2023)

Phenotyping of Elderly Patients With Heart Failure Focused on Noncardiac Conditions: A Latent Class Analysis From a Multicenter Registry of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure

  • Ryo Nakamaru,
  • Yasuyuki Shiraishi,
  • Nozomi Niimi,
  • Takashi Kohno,
  • Yuji Nagatomo,
  • Makoto Takei,
  • Takenori Ikoma,
  • Kei Nishikawa,
  • Munehisa Sakamoto,
  • Shintaro Nakano,
  • Shun Kohsaka,
  • Tsutomu Yoshikawa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027689
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Background The burden of noncardiovascular conditions is becoming increasingly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to identify novel phenogroups incorporating noncardiovascular conditions to facilitate understanding and risk stratification in elderly patients with HF. Methods and Results Data from a total of 1881 (61.2%) patients aged ≥65 years were extracted from a prospective multicenter registry of patients hospitalized for acute HF (N=3072). We constructed subgroups of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; N=826, 43.9%) and those with non‐HFpEF (N=1055, 56.1%). Latent class analysis was performed in each subgroup using 17 variables focused on noncardiovascular conditions (including comorbidities, Clinical Frailty Scale, and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index). The latent class analysis revealed 3 distinct clinical phenogroups in both HFpEF and non‐HFpEF subgroups: (1) robust physical and nutritional status (Group 1: HFpEF, 41.2%; non‐HFpEF, 46.0%); (2) multimorbid patients with renal impairment (Group 2: HFpEF, 40.8%; non‐HFpEF, 41.9%); and (3) malnourished patients (Group 3: HFpEF, 18.0%; non‐HFpEF, 12.1%). After multivariable adjustment, compared with Group 1, patients in Groups 2 and 3 had a higher risk for all‐cause death over the 1‐year postdischarge period (hazard ratio [HR], 2.79 [95% CI, 1.64–4.81] and HR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.39–5.35] in HFpEF; HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.22–3.14] and HR, 2.97 [95% CI, 1.64–5.38] in non‐HFpEF; respectively). Conclusions In elderly patients with HF, the phenomapping focused on incorporating noncardiovascular conditions identified 3 phenogroups, each representing distinct clinical outcomes, and the discrimination pattern was similar for both patients with HFpEF and non‐HFpEF. This classification provides novel risk stratification and may aid in clinical decision making.

Keywords