Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Oct 2020)

The three-dimensional printed template guided technique for S2 alar iliac screw placement and a comparison with freehand technique

  • Zhenhai Zhou,
  • Zhimin Zeng,
  • Honggui Yu,
  • Jiachao Xiong,
  • Zhiming Liu,
  • Rongping Zhou,
  • Wenbing Wan,
  • Zhimin Pan,
  • Lu Chen,
  • Kai Cao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020967110
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 28

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Sacropelvic fixation continues to present challenges when involved in the adult spinal deformity correction. The S2 alar iliac (S2AI) fixation is commonly used in sacropelvic fixation. Several techniques, including intraoperative navigation and freehand technique, were used for S2AI screws placement. The aim of this study is to analyze the anatomic parameters for S2AI screw trajectory in Asian population and introduce a novel technique described as a three-dimensional printed template guided technique (TGT). Meanwhile, the accuracy and safety of this technique were compared with the conventional freehand technique. Methods: The S2AI trajectory parameters were measured in 100 Asian adult volunteers. Parameters were compared between different genders. Forty-eight adult patients who underwent S2AI screw placement were reviewed: 28 patients received freehand technique and 20 patients received TGT technique. Postoperative computed tomography was used to assess the accuracy of screw trajectory and cortex violation-related complications were recorded. Results: The cephalocaudal angles (CAs), maximal length of screw pathway, narrowest width of pathway within the iliar teardrop, distance from the center of teardrop to sciatic notch, and distance of the start point distal to S1 dorsal foramen showed significant gender-related difference ( p < 0.05). All 48 patients were placed S2AI screws bilaterally (40 screws in TGT vs. 56 screws in freehand). One screw penetrated iliac cortex in the TGT group but 10 screws penetrated iliac cortex in the freehand group (3% vs. 17.9%) ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Approximately 30–35° of CA and 39° mediolateral angle are appropriate for S2AI screw placement in Asian patients. Either freehand or TGT technique is safe for S2AI screw placement. TGT technique is more accurate compared with the conventional freehand technique. Trial registration: This is a retrospective study.