Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Sep 2011)
Bloqueio atrioventricular no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca valvar: incidência, fatores de risco e evolução hospitalar Atrioventricular block in the postoperative period of heart valve surgery: incidence, risk factors and hospital evolution
Abstract
INTRODUÇÃO: Distúrbios do sistema de condução cardíaco são complicações potenciais e conhecidas dos procedimentos de cirurgia cardíaca valvar. OBJETIVOS: Investigar a associação entre fatores peri-operatórios com bloqueio atrioventricular (BAV) e a necessidade de estimulação cardíaca artificial temporária (ECAT) e, se necessário, implante de marcapasso definitivo no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca (POCC) valvar. MÉTODOS: Coorte histórica de pacientes submetidos a cirurgia cardíaca valvar, sendo realizada análise de banco de dados por regressão logística. RESULTADOS: No período de janeiro de 1996 a dezembro de 2008, foram realizadas 1102 cirurgias cardíacas valvares: 718 (65,2%) na valva aórtica e 407 (36,9%) na valva mitral; destas, 190 (17,2%) cirurgias de revascularização miocárdica associadas à cirurgia valvar e 23 (2,1%) cirurgias valvares combinadas (aórtica+mitral). Cento e oitenta e sete (17%) pacientes apresentaram quadro clínico e eletrocardiográfico de BAV durante o POCC valvar, necessitando de ECAT. Quatorze (7,5%) pacientes evoluíram para implante de marcapasso definitivo (1,27% do total da amostra). A análise multivariada evidenciou associação significativa de BAV com cirurgia de valva mitral (OR=1,76; IC 95% 1,08-2,37; P=0,002), implante de prótese biológica (OR=1,59; IC 95% 1,02-3,91; P= 0,039), idade maior que 60 anos (OR = 1,99; IC 95% 1,35-2,85; PINTRODUCTION: Disturbances of the cardiac conduction system are potential complications after cardiac valve surgery. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the association between perioperative factors and atrio-ventricular block, the need for temporary cardiac artificial pacing and, if necessary, permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac valve surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Cardiac Surgery Database - Hospital São Lucas/PUCRS. The data are collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Between January 1996 and December 2008 were included 1102 valve surgical procedures: 718 aortic valves (65.2%), 407 (36.9%) mitral valve and 190 (17.2%) coronar artery bypass grafting combined with valve repair and 23 (2.1%) aortic and mitral combined surgery. 187 patients (17%) showed clinical and electrocardiographic pattern of atrio-ventricular block requiring artificial temporary pacing. Of these, 14 patients (7.5%) required permanent pacemaker implantation (1.27% of the total valve surgery patients). Multivariate analysis showed association of the incidence of atrio-ventricular block and temporary pacing with mitral valve surgery (OR 1,76; CI 95% 1.08-2.37; P=0.002), implantation of bioprosthetic devices (OR 1.59; CI 95% 1.02-3.91; P=0,039), age over 60 years (OR 1.99; CI 95% 1.352.85; P<0.001), prior use of anti-arrhythmic drugs (OR 1.86; CI 95% 1.04-3.14; P=0.026) and previous use of b-blocker (OR 1.76; CI 95% 1.25-2.54; P=0.002). Remarkably the presence of atrio-ventricular block did not significantly show association with increased mortality, but significantly prolonged (P<0.0001) hospital length-of-stay and, therefore, hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents a group of predictive factors referring to a specific patient profile by which high risk of atrio-ventricular block and the need of temporary cardiac pacing after cardiac valve surgery it is determined
Keywords
