The Challenges in Investigating the Pathogenesis of Sensitive Skin by Noninvasive Measurements: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Shiyu Yan,1,2 Jinfeng Zhao,1,2 Yuqing Han,1,2 Rui Wang,1,2 Kexuan Bai,1,2 Junxin Ge,1,2 Yao Pan,1,2 Hua Zhao1,2 1Department of Cosmetics, College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, People’s Republic of China; 2Beijing Key Laboratory of Plant Research and Development, Beijing, 100048, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yao Pan, Department of Cosmetics, College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, 11 Fu Cheng Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing, 10048, People’s Republic of China, Tel [phone], Email [email protected]: Sensitive skin (SS) is a common cutaneous condition that seriously affects people’s quality of life, but studies of sensitive skin pathogenesis are unclear, the exploration are ongoing, and the biophysical properties of sensitive skin disagree with the study results. In this paper, we summarize the noninvasive biophysical and imaging instrumental methods used for sensitive skin and provide support for the classification of sensitive skin subtypes to prescribe precise treatment. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines for articles from January 1971 to May 2022 that used noninvasive biophysical or imaging methods to monitor adult subjects with sensitive skin. The quality of the included articles was determined based on 22 items of the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. A total of 55 studies were included, representing 8 biophysical and 5 imaging methods and their applications in treatment efficacy evaluation studies. The biophysical parameter and cutaneous morphological property changes in sensitive skin subjects were observed. The quality of the studies was relatively low, and there was high variability in results between studies. Several parameters have shown tremendous potential in exploring the pathogenesis with different sensitive skin subtypes: type I may be detected with higher transepidermal water loss and lower stratum corneum hydration values, as well as with thinner epidermis with a shallower and more irregular honeycomb structure; Type II and III are more prone to higher blood flow, lower current perception threshold than normal skin. This systematic review identifies key reasons for the lack of uniform trends in noninvasive measurements and recommends the use of effective selection instruments or relevant parameters to explore the pathogenesis of sensitive skin, and to differentiate the subtypes of sensitive skin for achieving the precise treatment.Keywords: sensitive skin, lactic acid sting test, transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, reflectance confocal microscopy, VISIAKeywords: sensitive skin, lactic acid sting test, transdermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, reflectance confocal microscopy, VISIA

Keywords

• sensitive skin
• lactic acid sting test
• transepidermal water loss
• stratum corneum hydration
• reflectance confocal microscopy
• visia