Cancer Medicine (Jun 2019)

Comparing high‐dose cisplatin with cisplatin‐based combination chemotherapy in definitive concurrent chemoradiation setting for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC)

  • Muhammad Furqan,
  • Travis P. Snyders,
  • Mohammed U. Saqlain,
  • Sarah L. Mott,
  • Douglas Laux,
  • Anthony Snow,
  • Carryn M. Anderson,
  • John M. Watkins,
  • Gerald H. Clamon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2139
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 6
pp. 2730 – 2739

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background High‐dose cisplatin (Cis) is a preferred systemic agent for concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC) patients. As some patients are unable to tolerate Cis, this study compares the toxicity and efficacy of weekly cisplatin‐paclitaxel (CP) regimen with Cis. Methods Patients with LAHNSCC receiving definitive chemoradiation either with Cis (Cisplatin—100 mg/m2 q3w x 3) or CP (Cisplatin—20 mg/m2; Paclitaxel—30 mg/m2qw x7) were included. Results Cis and CP groups were comprised of 114 and 111 subjects, respectively. Complete response for Cis versus CP groups was 88% versus 88%, respectively. Median follow‐up for the study was 58.5 months. After adjusting for potential treatment selection bias, no significant differences were evident between Cis and CP groups for overall survival (hazard ratios [HR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.59‐1.21, P = 0.36), progression free survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62‐1.24, P = 0.46), locoregional control (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52‐1.15, P = 0.21), and distant control (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.61‐1.23, P = 0.42). Patients in the CP group had less acute and chronic toxicities. Conclusions Weekly CP regimen can serve as an alternative systemic therapy with radiation in patients with LAHNSCC who are not fit for Cis.

Keywords