How Response Designs and Class Proportions Affect the Accuracy of Validation Data

Abstract

Reference data collected to validate land-cover maps are generally considered free of errors. In practice, however, they contain errors despite best efforts to minimize them. These errors propagate during accuracy assessment and tweak the validation results. For photo-interpreted reference data, the two most widely studied sources of error are systematic incorrect labeling and vigilance drops. How estimation errors, i.e., errors intrinsic to the response design, affect the accuracy of reference data is far less understood. In this paper, we analyzed the impact of estimation errors for two types of classification systems (binary and multiclass) as well as for two common response designs (point-based and partition-based) with a range of sub-sample sizes. Our quantitative results indicate that labeling errors due to proportion estimations should not be neglected. They further confirm that the accuracy of response designs depends on the class proportions within the sampling units, with complex landscapes being more prone to errors. As a result, response designs where the number of sub-samples is predefined and fixed are inefficient. To guarantee high accuracy standards of validation data with minimum data collection effort, we propose a new method to adapt the number of sub-samples for each sample during the validation process. In practice, sub-samples are incrementally selected and labeled until the estimated class proportions reach the desired level of confidence. As a result, less effort is spent on labeling univocal cases and the spared effort can be allocated to more ambiguous cases. This increases the reliability of reference data and of subsequent accuracy assessment. Across our study site, we demonstrated that such an approach could reduce the labeling effort by 50% to 75%, with greater gains in homogeneous landscapes. We contend that adopting this optimization approach will not only increase the efficiency of reference data collection, but will also help deliver more reliable accuracy estimates to the user community.

Keywords

• validation
• reference data
• remote sensing
• resolution
• accuracy assessment
• response design
• quality control
• sub-sampling
• overall accuracy