Frontiers in Pharmacology (Oct 2021)

Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability After Switching From Immediate or Prolonged-Release to Extended-Release Formulation, After an Organ Transplantation

  • Arnaud Del Bello,
  • Arnaud Del Bello,
  • Arnaud Del Bello,
  • Clotilde Gaible,
  • Nathalie Longlune,
  • Anne-Laure Hebral,
  • Laure Esposito,
  • Peggy Gandia,
  • Peggy Gandia,
  • Nassim Kamar,
  • Nassim Kamar,
  • Nassim Kamar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.602764
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Background and Purpose: Several formulations of tacrolimus are available, but evidence of the benefit of changing to the most recent formulations is lacking. Tacrolimus intra-patient variability (tacrolimus IPV) is an emerging risk factor associated with poor graft outcomes after solid organ transplantations. Here, we examined the modifications of tacrolimus IPV after switching to a different formulation of tacrolimus.Experimental Approach: We identified 353 solid organ transplant recipients that were switched in our center from immediate-release (IR-tacrolimus) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-tacrolimus) to extended-release, LCP-tacrolimus (LCP-tacrolimus). Among them, 54 patients underwent at least 3 available tacrolimus blood concentrations before and after the switch, allowing us to investigate tacrolimus IPV.Key Results: The switch was considered as a safe procedure since only four of the 353 patients presented a graft rejection after the switch, and no patient was hospitalized for tacrolimus overdose. The tacrolimus IPV estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV-IPV) was stable before and after the switch to LCP-tacrolimus (CV-IPV: 29.0% (IQR 25–75 (15.5; 38.5) before and 24.0% (15.8; 36.5) after the switch, p = 0.65).Conclusion and Implications: Switching from IR- or PR-tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus is a safe procedure. However, the CV-tacrolimus IPV was not impacted by the change of formulation.

Keywords