Halo 194 (Jan 2019)
Blood-borne disease markers analysis, creating testing algorithms and application of preventive measures
Abstract
Introduction/Aim The most common blood borne diseases or transfusion transmitted infections (TTI) are hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Numerous tests are used to prove the presence of these viruses indirectly (by detecting antibody presence - ELISA and CLIA) or directly (by detecting the presence of viral genome - NAT-PCR and LCR).To present a two-year analysis of testing for blood borne disease markers in pregnant women, patients preparing for surgery procedures and people with high-risk behavior (HBs Ag, anti-HCV and anti-HIV) at the Belgrade City Institute for Public Health and adopting measures for their prevention. Methodology During the two-year period, 11,983 pregnant women and 934 people with high-risk behavior were tested. Preliminary testing for HBs antigen, anti-HCV antibodies and anti-HIV antibodies was performed with 3rd generation ELISA tests ("Hepanostika HBsAg Uni-Form II", "Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II Ag / Ab" ; "The bioMérieux Clinical Diagnostics," manufactured in France; "Hepanostika HCV Ultra" is manufactured by "Beijing United Biomedical Co.Ltd.", China and the other two are manufactured in France). Primarily positive blood samples were tested again with the same test (in a duplicate procedure) on a new sample which was placed in a "dry" tube with no anticoagulant 10-14 days after being primarily positive for TTI markers. Those samples were also tested with a WB "Western Blot" confirmatory test - WB ("INNO-LIA HCV Ab III"; INNO-LIPA HBV Genotyping "and" INNO-LIA HIV I / II"). "Innogenetics NV ", Belgium is the manufacturer of all three confirmatory tests. Blood samples with positive results on the confirmatory tests for TTI were accepted as positive for HBs Ag, anti-HCV or anti-HIV. Results From 11,983 tested pregnant women, 152 (1.27%) were preliminarily reactive to HBsAg, 38 (0.32%) were confirmed positive for HBsAg and 114 (0.95%) were false reactive to HBsAg; 123 (1.03%) were preliminarily reactive to anti-HCV, 35 (0.29%) pregnant women were confirmed positive for antiHCV and 88 (0.74%) were false reactive for anti-HCV; and 15 (0.13%) pregnant women were preliminarily reactive to anti-HIV, 5 (0.04%) pregnant women were confirmed positive for anti-HIV and 10 (0.09%) were false reactive to anti-HIV. From 934 tested individuals with high-risk behavior 36 (3.85%) were preliminarily reactive to HBs Ag, 28 (2.99%) were confirmed positive for HBsAg and 8 (0.86%) were false reactive to HBsAg; 38 (4.07 %) were preliminarily reactive to anti-HCV, 33 (3.53%) were confirmed positive for anti-HCV and 5 (0.54%) false reactive to anti-HCV and 10 (1.07%) were preliminarily reactive to anti-HIV, 9 (0.96%) were confirmed anti-HIV positive and 1(0.11%) was false reactive to anti-HIV. Conclusion The results of our study showed a higher prevalence of HBsAg, anti-HCV and anti-HIV in people with high-risk behavior than in pregnant women. There are more false reactive results in pregnant women than in people with high-risk behavior. Preventive measures would include broader education on ways blood borne diseases are transmitted, testing blood and blood products with the latest generation of tests and correct execution of medical interventions with special attention on principles of asepsis and antisepsis.
