Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (Aug 2024)

A compact solution for vibrotactile proprioceptive feedback of wrist rotation and hand aperture

  • Andrea Marinelli,
  • Nicolò Boccardo,
  • Michele Canepa,
  • Dario Di Domenico,
  • Emanuele Gruppioni,
  • Matteo Laffranchi,
  • Lorenzo De Michieli,
  • Michela Chiappalone,
  • Marianna Semprini,
  • Strahinja Dosen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01420-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Closing the control loop between users and their prostheses by providing artificial sensory feedback is a fundamental step toward the full restoration of lost sensory-motor functions. Methods We propose a novel approach to provide artificial proprioceptive feedback about two degrees of freedom using a single array of 8 vibration motors (compact solution). The performance afforded by the novel method during an online closed-loop control task was compared to that achieved using the conventional approach, in which the same information was conveyed using two arrays of 8 and 4 vibromotors (one array per degree of freedom), respectively. The new method employed Gaussian interpolation to modulate the intensity profile across a single array of vibration motors (compact feedback) to convey wrist rotation and hand aperture by adjusting the mean and standard deviation of the Gaussian, respectively. Ten able-bodied participants and four transradial amputees performed a target achievement control test by utilizing pattern recognition with compact and conventional vibrotactile feedback to control the Hannes prosthetic hand (test conditions). A second group of ten able-bodied participants performed the same experiment in control conditions with visual and auditory feedback as well as no-feedback. Results Conventional and compact approaches resulted in similar positioning accuracy, time and path efficiency, and total trial time. The comparison with control condition revealed that vibrational feedback was intuitive and useful, but also underlined the power of incidental feedback sources. Notably, amputee participants achieved similar performance to that of able-bodied participants. Conclusions The study therefore shows that the novel feedback strategy conveys useful information about prosthesis movements while reducing the number of motors without compromising performance. This is an important step toward the full integration of such an interface into a prosthesis socket for clinical use.

Keywords