Frontiers in Surgery (Nov 2022)

Spotlight on clinical strategies of Chronic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Endovascular interventions and external-intracarotid bypasses compared to conservative treatment

  • Junnan Wu,
  • Chaoyou Fang,
  • Lingying Wei,
  • Yibo Liu,
  • Yibo Liu,
  • Houshi Xu,
  • Xiaoyu Wang,
  • Xiaoyu Wang,
  • Ling Yuan,
  • Xiaoya Wu,
  • Yuanzhi Xu,
  • Anke Zhang,
  • Anke Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.971066
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

Chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) has high prevalence and incidence rates, and patients with CICAO can be completely asymptomatic, experience a devastating stroke or die. It is important to note that CICAO causes cerebrovascular accidents. Currently, the external carotid-internal carotid (EC-IC) bypass technique is used to treat CICAO. However, many clinical studies showed that EC-IC bypass was not beneficial for many patients with CICAO. Meanwhile, endovascular intervention treatment options for CICAO are evolving, and an increasing number of patients are undergoing endovascular intervention therapy. Accordingly, a review comparing both techniques is warranted. For this review, we searched PubMed and collected relevant case study reports comparing endovascular interventional therapy and internal and external cervical bypass surgeries to provide strategies for clinical treatment.

Keywords