Acta Scientiarum: Agronomy (Mar 2019)

How to write the discussion section of a scientific article

  • Rogerio Faria Vieira,
  • Renan Cardoso de Lima,
  • Eduardo Seiti Gomide Mizubuti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.42621
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 41, no. 1
pp. e42621 – e42621

Abstract

Read online

he Discussion is the hardest section of a scientific article to write, as cognitive skills must be used to properly contextualize the findings of a study. In this article, we guide scientific writers, particularly unexperienced ones, on how to structure a Discussion section based on an article by Docherty and Smith (1999). According to these authors, a discussion should be prepared by organizing information in the following order: (a) statement of principal findings; (b) strengths and weaknesses of the study; (c) strengths and weaknesses in relation to other studies, discussing particularly any differences in results; (d) meaning of the study: possible mechanisms and implications; and (e) unanswered questions and future research. Each component of this sequence is discussed in detail with examples drawn from the literature.

Keywords