Neurobiology of Stress (Nov 2024)

Sex specific gut-microbiota signatures of resilient and comorbid gut-brain phenotypes induced by early life stress

  • Lars Wilmes,
  • Valentina Caputi,
  • Thomaz F.S. Bastiaanssen,
  • James M. Collins,
  • Fiona Crispie,
  • Paul D. Cotter,
  • Timothy G. Dinan,
  • John F. Cryan,
  • Gerard Clarke,
  • Siobhain M. O'Mahony

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33
p. 100686

Abstract

Read online

Background: Alterations in gut-brain axis communication pathways and the gut microbiota ecosystem caused by early life stress have been extensively described as critical players in the pathophysiology of stress-induced disorders. However, the extent to which stress-induced gut microbiota alterations manifest in early life and contribute to the sex-specific susceptibility to distinct gut-brain phenotypes in adulthood has yet to be defined. Methods: Male and female Sprague-Dawley rat offspring underwent maternal separation (3h/day from postnatal day 2–12). Faecal samples were collected before weaning for gut microbiota 16S rRNA sequencing and metabolomic analysis. Visceral pain sensitivity and negative valence behaviours were assessed in adulthood using colorectal distension and the forced swim test respectively. Behavioural data were processed in a two-step cluster analysis to identify groupings within the dataset. Multi-omics analysis was carried out to investigate if the microbial signatures following early life stress were already defined according to the membership of the adult behavioural phenotypes. Results: Maternal separation resulted in increased visceral hypersensitivity while showing a trend for a sex-dependent increase in negative valence behaviour in adulthood. The cluster analysis revealed four clusters within the dataset representing distinct pathophysiological domains reminiscent of the behavioural consequences of early-life stress: 1. resilient, 2. pain, 3. immobile and 4. comorbid. The early life gut microbiota of each of these clusters show distinct alterations in terms of diversity, genus level differential abundance, and functional modules. Multi-omic integrations points towards a role for different metabolic pathways underlying each cluster-specific phenotype. Conclusion: Our study is the first to identify distinct phenotypes defined by susceptibility or resilience to gut-brain dysfunction induced by early life stress. The gut microbiota in early life shows sex-dependent alterations in each cluster that precede specific behavioural phenotypes in adulthood. Future research is warranted to determine the causal relationship between early-life stress-induced changes in the gut microbiota and to understand the trajectory leading to the manifestation of different behavioural phenotypes in adulthood.

Keywords