Energies (Jan 2022)

Comment on Seibert, M.K.; Rees, W.E. Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition. <i>Energies</i> 2021, <i>14</i>, 4508

  • Vasilis Fthenakis,
  • Marco Raugei,
  • Christian Breyer,
  • Suby Bhattacharya,
  • Michael Carbajales-Dale,
  • Michael Ginsberg,
  • Arnulf Jäger-Waldau,
  • Enrica Leccisi,
  • Daniel Lincot,
  • David Murphy,
  • Marc J. R. Perez,
  • Parikhit Sinha,
  • Angus Rockett,
  • Sascha Sadewasser,
  • Billy J. Stanbery,
  • Richard M. Swanson,
  • Pierre Verlinden

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030971
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 3
p. 971

Abstract

Read online

This paper exposes the many flaws in the article “Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition, authored by Siebert and Rees and recently published in Energies as a Review. Our intention in submitting this critique is to expose and rectify the original article’s non-scientific approach to the review process that includes selective (and hence biased) screening of the literature focusing on the challenges related to renewable energies, without discussing any of the well-documented solutions. In so doing, we also provide a rigorous refutation of several statements made by a Seibert–Rees paper, which often appear to be unsubstantiated personal opinions and not based on a balanced review of the available literature.

Keywords