CLASSIFICATION AND FUNCTIONS OF AUTHOR'S INDIVIDUAL NON-USUAL UNITS IN A PHILOSOPHICAL TEXT

Abstract

The item focuses both on the functions and the pragmatics of non-usual units, which serve to explicate the ultimate concepts and ideas in texts belonging to the discourse of philosophy. There is a detailed classiication offered for non-usual units of a complex structure, depending on the degree of implementation of the newness and creatibility basic criteria in semantic components. The discourse in question is a special kind of practice that allows "quantum leaps" within the verbal representation of not the outcomes alone, yet also the process of thinking itself. It is this basic feature that might account for the integrated existence of language tools in it at various levels of the information coding system and the knowledge-related continuum, including its structural and noematic aspects. These units could be divided into neologisms, both individual and semantic and lexical, and occasional concepts and ideas that carry no content outside the closest context within the text. Their presence in the text ensures the implementation of cognitive non-usual information as well as gives the creating agent an opportunity to reflect on the associated phenomena. There is mention to be made of the hedonistic function of these units, too, which bring around, among other things, the linguistically vivid stylistic expressiveness of the text. The capacity of the philosophy language, coupled with the generally accepted functional potential, demonstrate certain philosophical text in-depth functions, which are never conventional, and are sometimes even crucial - intellectual, creationist, and appealing. They actualize not only the logical and rational components of the human mind, but also require genuine "growing into" the recipient's separation of the author's individual concept system.

Keywords

• occasional word
• neologism
• conceptualized term
• philosophical discourse
• hermeneutics