The Egyptian Heart Journal (Apr 2023)

Left atrial appendage morphofunctional indices could be predictive of arrhythmia recurrence post-atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis

  • Konstantinos A. Papathanasiou,
  • Dimitrios A. Vrachatis,
  • Dimitrios Kazantzis,
  • Charalampos Kossyvakis,
  • Sotiria G. Giotaki,
  • Gerasimos Deftereos,
  • Konstantinos Raisakis,
  • Andreas Kaoukis,
  • Dimitrios Avramides,
  • Vaia Lambadiari,
  • Gerasimos Siasos,
  • Spyridon Deftereos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-023-00356-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 75, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Left atrium changes are implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF) substrate and are predictive of AF outcomes. Left atrial appendage (LAA) is an integral component of left atrial structure and could be affected by atrial cardiomyopathy. We aimed to elucidate the association between LAA indices and late arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA). Methods The MEDLINE database, ClinicalTrials.gov, medRxiv and Cochrane Library were searched for studies evaluating LAA and late arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing AFCA. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was pre-ablation difference in LAA anatomic or functional indices. Results A total of 34 studies were found eligible and five LAA indices were analyzed. LAA ejection fraction and LAA emptying velocity were significantly lower in patients with AF recurrence post-ablation [SMD = − 0.66; 95% CI (− 1.01, − 0.32) and SMD = − 0.56; 95% CI (− 0.73, − 0.40) respectively] as compared to arrhythmia free controls. LAA volume and LAA orifice area were significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence post-ablation (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI 0.35–0.67, and SMD = 0.35; 95% CI 0.20–0.49, respectively) as compared to arrhythmia free controls. LAA morphology was not predictive of AF recurrence post-ablation (chicken wing morphology; OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.79–2.02). Moderate statistical heterogeneity and small case–control studies are the main limitations of our meta-analysis. Conclusions Our findings suggest that LAA ejection fraction, LAA emptying velocity, LAA orifice area and LAA volume differ between patients suffering from arrhythmia recurrence post-ablation and arrhythmia free counterparts, while LAA morphology is not predictive of AF recurrence.

Keywords