Blood Advances (Dec 2017)

Clinicopathologic consensus study of gray zone lymphoma with features intermediate between DLBCL and classical HL

  • Monika Pilichowska,
  • Stefania Pittaluga,
  • Judith A. Ferry,
  • Jessica Hemminger,
  • Hong Chang,
  • Jennifer A. Kanakry,
  • Laurie H. Sehn,
  • Tatyana Feldman,
  • Jeremy S. Abramson,
  • Athena Kritharis,
  • Francisco J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri,
  • Izidore S. Lossos,
  • Oliver W. Press,
  • Timothy S. Fenske,
  • Jonathan W. Friedberg,
  • Julie M. Vose,
  • Kristie A. Blum,
  • Deepa Jagadeesh,
  • Bruce Woda,
  • Gaurav K. Gupta,
  • Randy D. Gascoyne,
  • Elaine S. Jaffe,
  • Andrew M. Evens

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. 26
pp. 2600 – 2609

Abstract

Read online

Abstract: Gray zone lymphoma (GZL) is described as sharing features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there remains complexity in establishing diagnosis, delineating prognosis, and determining optimum therapy. Sixty-eight cases diagnosed as GZL across 15 North American academic centers were evaluated by central pathology review to achieve consensus. Of these, only 26 (38%) were confirmed as GZL. Morphology was critical to GZL consensus diagnosis (eg, tumor cell richness); immunohistochemistry showed universal B-cell derivation, frequent CD30 expression, and rare Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity (CD20+, 83%; PAX5+, 100%; BCL6+, 20%; MUM1+, 100%; CD30+, 92%; EBV+, 4%). Forty-two cases were reclassified: nodular sclerosis (NS) cHL, n = 27 (including n = 10 NS grade 2); lymphocyte predominant HL, n = 4; DLBCL, n = 4; EBV+ DLBCL, n = 3; primary mediastinal large BCL n = 2; lymphocyte-rich cHL and BCL–not otherwise specified, n = 1 each. GZL consensus-confirmed vs reclassified cases, respectively, more often had mediastinal disease (69% vs 41%; P = .038) and less likely more than 1 extranodal site (0% vs 25%; P = .019). With a 44-month median follow-up, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for patients with confirmed GZL were 39% and 95%, respectively, vs 58% and 85%, respectively, for reclassified cases (P = .19 and P = .15, respectively). Interestingly, NS grade 2 reclassified patients had similar PFS as GZL consensus-confirmed cases. For prognostication of GZL cases, hypoalbuminemia was a negative factor (3-year PFS, 12% vs 64%; P = .01), whereas frontline cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone ± rituximab (CHOP±R) was associated with improved 3-year PFS (70% vs 20%; P = .03); both factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. Altogether, accurate diagnosis of GZL remains challenging, and improved therapeutic strategies are needed.