Comparison of Calcaneal Subchondral Injection of Calcium Phosphate and Plantar Fasciotomy vs Plantar Fasciotomy Alone for Refractory Infracalcaneal Heel Pain

Abstract

Background: Treatment of chronic refractory heel pain has evolved to consider calcaneal structural fatigue as a component of the symptom profile. While concomitant calcium phosphate injection has become a method of addressing the accompanying calcaneal bone marrow edema (BME) frequently seen in this population, there is no literature supporting its use compared to traditional fasciotomy. Methods: Consecutive patients with symptoms of refractory infracalcaneal heel pain and calcaneal BME were treated in our practice by either surgical fasciotomy (n = 33) or fasciotomy plus calcium phosphate injection (n = 31) between 2014 and 2019. Outcomes were retrospectively assessed via Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), return to activity, and complication rate. Results: Sixty-four patients (64 feet) were included with a mean age of 50.3 ± 12.9 years and mean follow-up of 23.2 ± 22.3 months. No differences were observed between groups preoperatively. Significant improvements in 4 of 5 FAOS subscales were observed postoperatively in both groups ( P .05, Fisher exact test). Conclusion: In patients presenting with recalcitrant infracalcaneal heel pain accompanied by calcaneal BME, calcium phosphate injection into the calcaneus, when combined with plantar fasciotomy, was safe and more effective than traditional plantar fasciotomy alone. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.