Participatory ethnobotany: comparison between two quilombos in the Atlantic Forest, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
Thamara Sauini,
Paulo Henrique Gonçalves Santos,
Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque,
Priscila Yazbek,
Cremilda da Cruz,
Eduardo Hortal Pereira Barretto,
Maria Alice dos Santos,
Maria Angélica Silva Gomes,
Ginacil dos Santos,
Silvestre Braga,
Ricardo José Francischetti Garcia,
Sumiko Honda,
Priscila Matta,
Sonia Aragaki,
Anderson Ueno,
Eliana Rodrigues
Affiliations
Thamara Sauini
Centro de Estudos Etnobotânicos e Etnofarmacológicos (CEE)—Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Paulo Henrique Gonçalves Santos
Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas Socioecológicos (LEA), Centro de Biociências, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas Socioecológicos (LEA), Centro de Biociências, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Priscila Yazbek
Centro de Estudos Etnobotânicos e Etnofarmacológicos (CEE)—Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Cremilda da Cruz
Associação dos Remanescentes de Quilombo do Cambury, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
Eduardo Hortal Pereira Barretto
Herbário Municipal, Prefeitura do Municipio de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Maria Alice dos Santos
Associação dos Remanescentes de Quilombo do Cambury, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
Maria Angélica Silva Gomes
Associação dos Remanescentes de Quilombo do Cambury, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
Ginacil dos Santos
Quilombo da Fazenda, Associação da Comunidade dos Remanescentes de Quilombo da Fazenda, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
Silvestre Braga
Quilombo da Fazenda, Associação da Comunidade dos Remanescentes de Quilombo da Fazenda, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
Ricardo José Francischetti Garcia
Herbário Municipal, Prefeitura do Municipio de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Sumiko Honda
Herbário Municipal, Prefeitura do Municipio de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Priscila Matta
Centro de Estudos Ameríndios (CEstA), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Sonia Aragaki
Herbário SP, Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais (IPA), Secretaria de Meio Ambiente, Infraestrutura e Logística do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Anderson Ueno
Centro de Estudos Etnobotânicos e Etnofarmacológicos (CEE)—Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Eliana Rodrigues
Centro de Estudos Etnobotânicos e Etnofarmacológicos (CEE)—Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Ethnobotanical studies that use the participatory research approach seek to involve the residents of a community in different stages of the study, promoting the registration, dissemination and strengthening of local knowledge, as well as the empowerment of decisions related to the sustainable use and management of resources. Using the participatory methodology, this study recorded and made a comparative analysis on the use of plants in two quilombola communities (Quilombo do Cambury-QC and Quilombo da Fazenda-QF) in the State of São Paulo. After a training on anthropological and botanical methods, local researchers selected and interviewed the local experts, recording their knowledge on plant uses and collecting the indicated plants, to be identified and deposited in herbariums. In addition, participant observation and field diaries were used by the academic researchers, helping to analyze the data. To test the differences in the composition of species known to local community, a Jaccard dissimilarity matrix was created, and a Permanova test was employed. During the 178 days of fieldwork, three local researchers from the QC and two from the QF, selected nine and eight experts on the uses of the plants in each quilombo, respectively, corresponding to 214 plant species, indicated for eight ethnobotanical categories. Our hypothesis has been confirmed, since the traditional knowledge found in both quilombos, regarding plant uses and the number of plant species by category, are distinct, since each community occupies particular plant areas and different phytophysiognomies. Most of the indicated species are native to the Atlantic forest, and no significant differences were observed in the proportion of native species vs. introduced among quilombos for any of the categories of use studied. Furthermore, the innovative methodology used, participatory ethnobotany, contributed to the empowerment of community members with regard to the use of their available resources in the environment in which they live, while retaining the intellectual property rights over their own knowledge.